Pretty sure this is DLFem21 again in ACP00071qe and ACP00071qf, unfortunately only the tiniest glimpse at her face. She has the same larger build, dark back and legs, dark rear with almost no pink, bald hips, and dorsal infant. I suspect she has one large juvenile (seen in these two new clips), and in the previous video of her -- ACP00071au -- only one of the two juveniles is actually hers.
Let's see if we can find another video with her face : )
Definitely! I knew we could match the hips again easily once we found them. And the infant is the same size with the white tuft as cute little DLInfant21. Good job, @jwidness!
All three sequences are from the same cam within 2 weeks of each other. Still no face view 😕 I'm worried that if we name her without a good face view that we might accidentally match her from the front as someone else.
Hi all, I agree we should not name individuals only based on their back view as they might be someone else we only know from the face. (I do not think that any of our named females could be this one though.) Just as a standard. We can acknowledge and make the match, but not name them. If we really want to name them (I think, it's not necessary) then we should do it at the very end when all videos are together and re-checked again. Without a face (or something recognizable like the half face view), it will not be possible to find her again.
What about this female with a dorsal infant followed by a juvenile. Position of the baby might be a bit suggestive. But robust body build and very "invisible" swelling. ACP00064no Just came up for classification. Still no face view. 😦
I think we should have them together, and I decided to create a new post for those that are a potential match but that we can´t tell for sure. Maybe we can go back to them at some point :]